Ruth Ann Dailey (Columnist: Pittsburgh Post Gazette) "Lewis Fogle's 34 Stolen Years"

  Pittsburgh Post-Gazette columnist Ruth Ann Dailey

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette columnist Ruth Ann Dailey

to leave comment or response, please click on story title and comments appear at end of story.  Thank you.  

also, please check out the "archived blog" section of this page to read past articles.  thanks for your support

Ruth Ann Dailey                                       ruthanndailey@hotmail.com

Thirty-four years. Stop and think for a moment about all you’ve experienced in the past 34 years.

For me, that represents my entire adult life — all the years since high school, the years I’ve worked, loved, enjoyed and pretty much encountered the world on my own terms.

For Lewis Fogle, those 34 years passed in prison. He spent that time on someone else’s terms — a life term on our terms — for a crime he always insisted he didn’t commit.

Now our government agrees with him — or at least it has confessed it should not have convicted him. He was released Thursday, into the arms of his wife Deb, whom he had married only three months before his arrest all those years ago.

If it weren’t for the work of the Innocence Project, Mr. Fogle, 63, of Indiana County, would have spent the rest of his life behind bars.

For decades now, the phrase “tough on crime” has been a positive description for any political candidate. In the post-war era, as the country suffered an ever-escalating rate of violent crime, we citizens wanted “law and order” leaders who would “throw the book” at criminals.

  Fogle speaks with reporters after being released from prison after serving 34 years for a crime he did not commit.

Fogle speaks with reporters after being released from prison after serving 34 years for a crime he did not commit.

The most ironic of the phrases used to express our resolve to bring evil-doers to justice, however, is that we’d “get biblical” on them. Perhaps that springs from the well-known words of Genesis: “Whoever sheds man’s blood, by man his blood shall be shed.”

Or from Exodus: “Eye for eye, tooth for tooth …”

But the penalty comes only after the truth has been established, and there our modern courts have sometimes fallen tragically short of the biblical standard. The Innocence Project and other organizations that search for and try to overturn wrongful convictions are revealing that what passes for evidence sufficient to end a person’s life or liberty can be shockingly flimsy.

Mr. Fogle’s is one of these. He was convicted of second-degree murder in the death of Deann Long, a 15-year-old girl who had been raped and shot in the head.

He was convicted in 1982 for a crime that occurred in 1976. The man who implicated him did so only after being interrogated five times over a five-year period and despite being himself the person last seen with the victim.

On this basis Mr. Fogle was arrested, and at trial, three jailhouse informants testified that he’d confessed while incarcerated. Although no physical evidence connected him to the crime and his family vouched for his whereabouts, he was found guilty of second-degree murder.

Would you vote to convict with only this testimony against him?

An even starker decision overturned in January was that of Joseph Sledge, 70, of North Carolina, who served 37 years for a double murder. He was exonerated when DNA testing showed the hairs found on the victims were not his and when the jailhouse informant recanted his testimony, confessing he’d lied to get leniency himself.

The Bible standard, from Deuteronomy, is that one witness is insufficient to convict of crime but “at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.”

Is it two or three? The graver the crime, the more evidence should be mustered. But what if all three witnesses are jailhouse informants? What if they have, in effect, sold their testimony?

  Celebrating after 34 years of incarcertation

Celebrating after 34 years of incarcertation

One witness is not enough to convict, but one powerful witness — DNA evidence — has rightly proven sufficient to clear a man’s name. Similar to Mr. Sledge’s case, Mr. Fogle was freed when recent DNA testing demonstrated the semen on Deann Long’s body was not his.

Although DNA evidence enters only 5 to 10 percent of criminal cases, every part of a trial is open to scrutiny, and officials are increasingly willing to reopen matters once routinely denied. States are even establishing their own investigating agencies, such as North Carolina’s Innocence Inquiry Commission, which requested Mr. Sledge’s exoneration.

The numbers keep climbing. In 2013 a record 83 convictions were overturned nationwide, according to a registry kept by the University of Michigan School of Law. The number dipped to 75 in 2014, but this year’s monthly rate is on track for a total near 100.

Most of us can never imagine the gratitude the Fogles and others must feel toward crusaders for justice, but we all have to be grateful these crusaders exist.

Justice will be miscarried as long as human beings are administering it. We can reduce the frequency — and reduce suffering all around — if we remember this with humility.

Ruth Ann Dailey: ruthanndailey@hotmail.com

 

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

INDIVIDUAL CRIMES, INSTITUTIONAL SINS: GUILTY ALL

BY RUTH ANN DAILEY

http://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/ruth-ann-dailey/2012/06/25/Individual-crimes-institutional-sins-guilty-all/stories/201206250144

Ruth Ann Dailey                                       ruthanndailey@hotmail.com

(Excerpt)

Archbishops, corporate honchos, university bigwigs and public officials from City Hall to the White House forget this: You don't double down on evil. The more you try to hide it, the more it will come back to bite your collective backside.

And you'll deserve it -- because the failure to root out evil allows it to thrive and creates more victims.

Make no mistake: It was an individual -- a priest, a coach -- who committed these crimes against children. But both men belonged to huge enterprises whose leaders at some point became aware of the crime and either chose to look the other way or to actively hide the truth, evade justice and enable more crime. How could they think this would turn out well?

The failure of a church to eradicate abusers from its ranks is an unparalleled betrayal. The church exists to bring hope and healing into people's lives. When instead it brings abuse and despair, it has utterly betrayed its mission.

  Disgraced Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky

Disgraced Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky

Jerry Sandusky, former Penn State Football Coach, In 2011, following a two-year grand jury investigation, Sandusky was arrested and charged with 52 counts of sexual abuse of young boys over a 15-year period from 1994 to 2009. He met his molestation victims through The Second Mile, who were children participating in the organization, and several of them testified against Sandusky in his sexual abuse trial. Four of the charges were subsequently dropped. On June 22, 2012, Sandusky was found guilty on 45 of the 48 remaining charges.

  Philadelphia Catholic Priest Msgr. William J. Lynn

Philadelphia Catholic Priest Msgr. William J. Lynn

Msgr. William J. Lynn was convicted and sentenced after a landmark 13-week trial in 2012 over his role supervising priests accused of sexually abusing children. The jury found that Lynn allowed Rev. Edward V. Avery, who had a history of sexually abusing children, to live in a Northeast Philadelphia rectory, where he later assaulted a 10-year-old altar boy. Avery pleaded guilty in the 1999 attack and is serving five years in prison.